The Pistol Club

Firearm News
Page 3

Visit Most Recent Firearm News, Now...
Page One ~ Firearms In The News



Home Page   ~  Link Page  ~  News Page ~ Buying a Pistol ~ Sales ~ Support Groups





Firearms in the NEWS....continued

Go to Page 1  ~ Page 2 ~ Page 3 Firearms in the NEWS

New State Laws Limit Self-Defense Options
Constitution Be Damned

Sniper tips aid hunt for firearms 

Two arrested in gun-law uproar

Gun injuries cost U.S. $802 million

Judge says student can't wear T-shirt to school
while lawsuit is pending

In a surprise, Bush backs a ban
on assault weapons

FBI Takes Woman Into Custody at KCI

Politeness Guidelines Spark Hate Mail

NRA Chalks Up Victories

Exposing the Liberal Media Game
– Part II –

New York sues Wal-Mart over realistic toy guns

House passes gun-suit immunity bill

Radio show targets gun-maker suits

Two arrested in gun-law uproar

Gun injuries cost U.S. $802 million

Judge says student can't wear T-shirt to school while lawsuit is pending    

License to own ammunition?

McGreevey signs 'smart gun' bill

Lock and load

Save the Children

Frist no friend of gun owners

*Click* Here ~ To Read a Letter to Colonel Hackworth

Britain's 'James Bond' Gangsters Worry Police

Court asked to rethink its ruling on weapons ban 

Supreme Court injustice?

Columbia Rescinds History Prize for Book

Judge: Gun seller can't question juror 

2nd Amendment defended by judges

No right to bear arms? 

 

Supreme Court Rejects Gun Rights for Felons

9th (Short)Circut Court    

'Landmark' Ruling Attacks Right to Bear Arms     

Appeals Court Supports Calif. Weapons Ban

2nd Amendment petition sent to Ashcroft

Blacks and Guns

Agents raid Tacoma gun shop

Gun Owners Finally Win on Arming Pilots!

D.C. Gun Law Under Fire

New Jersey Lawmakers Demand Nonexistent 'Smart Guns'

Gun show opponents plan protest

Gun control myths

City Council votes to register guns

Brave Investigative Reporter Battles Evil Snipers

4th-grader suspended for gun shell in pocket

D.C. Gun Ban Challenged

Judge Sentences Rancher for Harassing Mexican Migrant

Get a Gun

Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow

America's real defense against terror

More gun control, please: Part II

Freedom First: America Votes Pro-Gun Rights

Gun Control’s Twisted Outcome

Court says Chicago can sue gun makers

Dishonoring an Honor Guard

SUREFIRE CRIME CONTROL...WE NEED MORE OF IT!!

Annie Get Your Gun

Why the Anti-gun Egghead Lost His Job

Snuffy and Me

Colonial Gun Owners' Payback!

Guns and Violence

Man Killed After Repeated Domestic Violence Incidents

 





April 10, 2003, 2:20PM
New York sues Wal-Mart
over realistic toy guns

Reuters News Service

NEW YORK -New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said today his office is suing Wal-Mart Stores Inc., alleging that the world's largest retailer sells toy weapons that could be mistaken for real firearms.

The suit, filed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, seeks to stop Wal-Mart from selling toy guns in New York State that Spitzer claims violate a state law requiring them to bear distinctive orange markings.

A Wal-Mart spokesman said he could not immediately respond to the suit.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the Original Article
HoustonChronicle.com

Back to Table of Contents

 
ON CAPITOL HILL
House passes gun-suit immunity bill
'We shouldn't use the judicial process to bankrupt an industry'

Posted: April 11, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The House has passed a bill that protects gun manufacturers from lawsuits that have left the industry reeling financially, though not a single court has yet to hold a manufacturer liable for criminal misuse of its products.

Lawmakers yesterday easily passed the measure 285-140, with most Republicans backing it. Democrats were split, Reuters reported.

"We shouldn't use the judicial process to bankrupt an industry that makes a legal product," said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. He went on to accuse gun-control groups of using the court system push a "back door" political agenda.

Gun-control groups have said they wanted to impose financial hardships on gun makers by taking them to court and forcing them to spend tens of thousands of dollars defending their products.

So far, one company – Navegar Inc. – has declared bankruptcy, though lawsuits brought against the company in California failed to find it negligent in a 1993 San Francisco multiple homicide.

The Bush administration said it strongly supports the bill, adding it would "prevent abuse of the legal system and help curb the growing problem of frivolous lawsuits." The bill now moves on to the Senate, where nearly half of senators have signed on to cosponsor it.

Gun-control groups say they oppose the bill because it would allow shoddy gun manufacturers off the hook financially and leave victims and their families without redress in the courts.

In a series of lawsuits filed by a number of cities and municipalities near the end of the Clinton administration, gun-control supporters say gun makers should be held liable for criminal misuse of their products and should be made to compensate cities financially for funds spent on treating victims of armed criminal action.

Courts so far haven't bought that argument, but groups such as the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence have persisted. Officials of the group say they will unveil internal industry documents showing that some gun makers and dealers knowingly supply guns to criminals.

If the bill clears the Senate and is signed by President Bush, it will negate some 300 pending state and federal lawsuits, and prevent such suits in the future.

As WND reported, Gun Owners of America, a Virginia-based gun-rights group, warned that the lawsuits would ultimately harm national security if they successfully shut down a number of key gun manufacturers.

Erich Pratt, spokesman for GOA, said groups like the Brady Campaign and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People – which has a gun industry suit pending in New York – are "helping to cripple the very industry that supplies our men with their weapons."

In a statement, GOA said, "The National Shooting Sports Foundation has documented the patriotic service that many of the gun makers, who are named in the NAACP suit, have offered to our country."

Included on that list are Colt, one of the makers of the U.S. military's M-16 series of rifles; Smith & Wesson, one of the largest producers of firearms for the military and law enforcement; Browning, credited with giving the U.S. and its allies firearms superiority throughout the two world wars, as well as the Korean War; Sturm, Ruger & Company, which donated rifles to the New York City Police Department in the days following Sept. 11, 2001, for the protection of the people of the city; Glock, also a major supplier of firearms to law enforcement and military personnel; and Sig Arms, which provides the official sidearm for the U.S. Navy SEALS.

Related story:

Gun group denounces industry suits

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the Original Article
WorldNetDaily.com

Back to Table of Contents

 
WND ON 'AMERICAN BREAKFAST'
Radio show targets gun-maker suits
Reporter Jon Dougherty to talk about NAACP legal action

Discussing his story on the most recent lawsuits targeting gun makers, WorldNetDaily reporter and columnist Jon Dougherty will be a guest on the nationally syndicated radio program "American Breakfast" this morning at 8 a.m. Eastern time.

In his story, Dougherty reports on the most recent legal action against the manufacturers of firearms, this time led by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The suit seeks to hold gun makers liable for violence perpetrated using their products. Dougherty points out that because some of the companies targeted supply the U.S. military with weapons, the cost of legal action could have an effect on national readiness.

Broadcasting live from the Shawmut Diner in New Bedford, Mass., host Phil Paleologos invites "American Breakfast" listeners every weekday morning to pull up a stool and participate in lively discussions about American ideals.

Every Friday, "American Breakfast" features a WorldNetDaily reporter, editor or columnist in the 8 a.m. Eastern hour.

Find a station in your area where you can tune in to "American Breakfast," or listen online at CableRadioNetwork.com.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the Original Article
WorldNetDaily.com

Back to Table of Contents

 
Posted on Mon, Dec. 23, 2002

McGreevey signs 'smart gun' bill

Inquire Trenton Bureau

TRENTON - New Jersey today became the first state to enact a law requiring that new handguns be sold with technology that allows only designated users to fire the weapons.

"It is clearly time we have safety regulations on handguns," Gov. McGreevey said at a ceremony where he signed the "smart gun" bill.

But the law won't be enforced for years. Technology required to personalize guns is still in development and would not actually be mandated until three years after the state attorney general determines the high-tech weapons are ready to be sold commercially.

The state is financing an effort by the New Jersey Institute of Technology to design a handgun that would comply with the law. The institute has been working on a grip-recognition technology that would enable gun shops or police stations to program the weapons for specific users.

Supporters of the law lobbied for it as a child-protection measure. They said the technology would help reduce suicides, prevent accidental shootings and keep children from using their parents' weapons.

"If we saved one child's life, we would have done something monumental in the state of New Jersey," McGreevey said.

Gun-owner rights organizations have said the law is a backhanded attempt at banning new handgun sales in New Jersey. The technology, they have asserted, will never be reliable enough to put into practice.

Guns, critics have said, would be turned from being mechanical to electronic, relying on microchips and wiring that would be vulnerable to failure. Some have labeled the law an exercise in science-fiction, while others suggested the price of a gun with the technology would be cost-prohibitive.

Don Sebastian, a technology institute vice president heading up the research at the school, estimated the price of a $500 gun would increase by $50 to $75 when equipped with grip-recognition technology. Because taxpayer money is being used to develop the technology, he said, manufacturers would not have to pass along the costs.

Police organizations supported the law, but lobbied to have themselves exempted from its requirements. The original idea for the smart gun was to protect officers from having their weapons turned against them.

Under the law, a panel would be appointed to review when such weapons could be used by law enforcement.

Bryan Miller, executive director of Ceasefire New Jersey, said the law would put pressure on gun manufacturers to step up their research so they would be able to sell their wares in the state.

He had pushed for passage of the law for six years. The bill passed the Senate three times but failed in the Assembly until this year.

Supporters of the law are hopeful it will make it easier for other states and eventually Congress to pass similar legislation. They equated the law with the assault-weapons ban.

"This is an important day for the children, parents and grandparents of New Jersey, and for those across the country," Miller said.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the Original Article
Philly.com

Back to Table of Contents

 

Lock and load:
Louisiana puts $4 bounty on nutrias

By DOUG SIMPSON, Associated Press
Published 4:36 a.m. PST Monday, December 23, 2002

LULING, La. (AP) - Cajun country's No. 1 nuisance - 10-pound swamp rats with orange buck teeth and webbed feet - are Kyle Loupe's cash cow.

Emerging from the bayous in an airboat splotched with blood and Spanish moss, Loupe plunks down more than 1,200 tails that once wagged from Louisiana's reviled rodents known as nutria, and will collect $4,824 in return.

Loupe owes the windfall to Louisiana's three-week-old, $4-a-tail-bounty program that aims to wipe out 400,000 nutria this winter, and save an eroding coastline that's been disappearing at an estimated rate of 30 square miles a year.

Nutria, a non-native species that has overrun Gulf of Mexico wetlands since the value of their fur plummeted in the early 1980s, devour plants that keep the soil from washing away.

"The nutria run away, but they're not that quick," said Loupe, who picks off the pests with his .22 rifle. "Sometimes you see two, three, four on a hill, and you get all of them. There's none that gets away."

Louisiana has tried just about everything to get rid of the rodents. Nutria cuisine didn't catch on, and nutria fur coats fell out of favor. Sheriff's deputies still shoot them for target practice, and recreational nutria hunting had its debut last year.

Now, it's time for the professionals.

About 400 hunters and trappers have signed up for the bounty system - known as the Nutria Control Program. In the first week, they turned in 4,863 of the long, hairy tails.

"I expect us to be collecting 8,000 a week, maybe 10,000 if we really get on a hot streak," said Jeff Marx, a state biologist.

Nutria were imported from Argentina in the 1930s because state officials believed they would enhance the fur trade. Among those raising nutria were Tabasco hot sauce founder E.A. McIlhenny.

But no one anticipated the animals' prodigious breeding prowess, or their enormous appetite. Alligators are the only predator that commonly eats nutria, and as the gator population dropped, the rodents have enjoyed free rein to chomp their way through the marshes.

Most are in the marshy areas of south Louisiana, and they've also crept into suburban New Orleans. State wildlife officials say up to 100,000 acres of Louisiana marsh show signs of damage from nutria.

So far, the bounty program is getting good reviews.

"I expected anything run by the state to be full of problems, but somebody put a lot of thought into this," said hunter Albert Oberschmidt, who shot 23 nutria and is due a $92 check for the tails.

Loupe, normally a commercial crab fisherman, is the top nutria hunter so far. The crab season is unprofitable in the winter, so until nutria season is over March 31 he'll make his living switching between fishing for catfish and hunting for nutria.

"What I do is go shoot one day, then give the nutria a day to regroup. We give them a break in between," he said.

Loupe said he kills nutria in batches of 50, piling the carcasses into his boat. He uses a machete to chop off the tails, and sets them aside. He dumps half of the bodies in the water, and half get buried. Then he goes back for more.

"On a good day, we get about 80 in five or six hours," he said.

But Loupe's success is the exception rather than the rule. Most nutria hunters are just picking up a few extra dollars. The state has set aside $1.6 million to pay hunters and trappers, and the $4 bounty isn't designed to make anyone rich, said Kim Barton, a project manager with Coastal Environments Inc., which the state hired to run the program.

"The point is just to kill as many nutria as we can, because they're pretty much killing off the state," Barton said.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Read the Original Article
Sacbee.com

Back to Table of Contents

 
Save the Children
by Fred Pirello

December 22, 2002

Keepandbeararms.com -- On December 16th, 2002, a 16-year-old high school sophomore named Christopher Green was killed by a handgun. Christopher died in surgery after being rushed to the hospital with three gunshot wounds. It happened in Pinellas Park, Florida, but it could have happened anywhere.

This young man, I’m sure, was looking forward to the holiday break from school and was anticipating Christmas with his family. His life was brutally cut short by a handgun - a weapon designed for the sole purpose of taking human life. Christopher will become one of the statistics cited by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the Violence Policy Center (VPC). These organizations are exquisitely sensitive to the issue of children killed by gun violence.

There is only one twist to this little tale. Christopher had just robbed a gas station and was caught in the act of raping the lone attendant. When he pointed his revolver at a police officer, the officer fired four shots in self defense. Christopher is history, and the statistics will yield only a perverse shadow of what truly happened.

Back to Table of Contents

 
CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Frist no friend of gun owners
Candidate for Senate leader has history of anti-firearms support

Posted: December 23, 2002
11:25 a.m. Eastern
By Jon Dougherty
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

More questions have arisen about the GOP senator most likely to replace Mississippi Republican Trent Lott as majority leader, this time from gun-rights groups who say he is no friend of the Second Amendment.

According to an analysis posted on firearms rights website KeepandBearArms.com Frist has a poor record of standing up for gun rights.

And Gun Owners of America, a 300,000-member group based in Springfield, Va., has given Frist the grade of "D" in regards to his record of votes regarding gun rights – despite his being a top recipient of donations from the National Rifle Association.

Among Frist's anti-gun votes, he:

  • helped kill a filibuster on the Shays-Meehan campaign finance reform bill that conservatives believe squelched the voice of pro-gun groups;
  • voted against a filibuster and in favor of sending an anti-gun crime bill to a House-Senate crime committee;
  • voted with Democrats to help pass the Lautenberg anti-gun crime bill;
  • supported two other gun control proposals.

    "Trent Lott has been an unprincipled disaster - the sooner he is made to fall on his sword, the better," wrote David Codrea, a co-founder of Citizens of America, a national gun-rights advertising campaign. "But Bill Frist is a completely unacceptable replacement. Republicans will elect him Senate majority leader at the risk of enraging and alienating the most reliable constituency they have ever had" – gun owners.

  • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read More of This Article
    WorldNet Daily.com

    Back to Table of Contents

     

    Britain's 'James Bond' Gangsters
    Worry Police

    Reuters
    Thursday, December 19, 2002; 10:31 AM

    By Michael Holden

    LONDON (Reuters) - London gangsters are arming themselves with handguns modeled on the famous Walther PPK used by James Bond as the British capital experiences a worrying surge in gun crime, the city's police chief said on Thursday.

    "There is no 'street cred' in a sawn-off shotgun for the majority of today's armed criminals," London police Commissioner Sir John Stevens told reporters.

    "Handguns, particularly those modeled on the James Bond Walther PPK -- real and replica -- are the weapons of choice for today's modern gunman."

    Stevens was speaking out as gun crime rockets in the capital with gangsters more readily shooting rivals and the police. Most shootings are related to drug-fueled turf wars between Jamaican-based "Yardies" and, increasingly in some areas, Turkish and Kurdish gangs.

    Police say there have been 200 shootings in the last eight months, compared to 171 in the same period last year, with 22 murders. Last year there were 38 fatal shootings compared to just 19 in 1992. Officers are now seizing an average of 144 guns every month.

    As if to highlight Stevens' fears, two unarmed policemen were shot at in the early hours of Thursday as they pursued a suspect in the north London district of Islington, where Prime Minister Tony Blair used to live.

    Two weeks ago in the same area, a policeman was shot in the stomach following a chase and is still in hospital. That same day four plain-clothes officers were shot at when they approached two suspected drug dealers.

    "The threat to officers must not be underestimated. We have identified some worrying trends in gun-crime in London that are giving us serious cause for concern -- both the threat to the public and our own officers," Stevens said.

    Last month mothers grieving over children killed in the drug-fueled wars on the capital's streets marched to Blair's Downing Street residence to demand tougher action.

    Stevens said he hoped to have another 40 specialist armed officers by next year along with another two armed response units. Currently only about seven percent of London's police can carry a gun at any one time.

    Despite his concern at the rise in shootings, Stevens said he did not envisage the majority of Britain's unarmed "bobbies on the beat" abandoning their famed gun-free image.

    "God willing it won't happen as long as I'm commissioner," he told Reuters in June.

    Full Legal Notice

    © 2002 Reuters

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article

    WashingtonPost.com

    Back to Table of Contents 


    Court asked to rethink its ruling
    on weapons ban

    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    December 17, 2002



    SAN FRANCISCO –
    A federal appeals court was asked yesterday to reconsider its Dec. 6 ruling that individuals have no right to bear arms under the Second Amendment.

    In ruling 2-1, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld California's ban on assault weapons.

    Owners of assault weapons and those wanting to purchase them challenged 1999 amendments to California's 1989 ban that outlawed 75 high-powered weapons with rapid-fire capabilities.

    The Legislature passed the nation's first law banning such weapons after a gunman fired a semiautomatic weapon into a Stockton schoolyard, killing five children and injuring 30.

    Following California's lead, several states and the federal government passed similar or stricter bans.

    In dismissing the bulk of the challenge, the San Francisco-based appeals court panel said the Second Amendment was not adopted "in order to afford rights to individuals with respect to private gun ownership or possession."

    The decision – which said weapons were properly allowed for the states to maintain militias – conflicts with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said individuals had a constitutional right to guns.

    Gary Gorski, the attorney who brought the case before the 9th Circuit, said if the court rules against him again or declines to rehear the case, he would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the challenge. The high court has never squarely ruled on the issue.

    "I want this question answered once and for all," Gorski said yesterday.

     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article
    SanDiego.com

    Back to Table of Contents 

     

     
    Columbia Rescinds History Prize
    for Book

    By HILLEL ITALIE
    Associated Press Writer

    NEW YORK (AP)--Severe doubts about a book on guns in the United States has led Columbia University to rescind the prestigious Bancroft Prize for history.

    ``Arming America,'' by Michael Bellesiles, had received the award in 2001.

    In a statement released Friday, Columbia said that the school's trustees had concluded ``his book had not and does not meet the standards ... established for the Bancroft Prize.'' Columbia has asked Bellesiles to return the prize money, $4,000.

    It was the first time in the 54-year history of the Bancroft award that Columbia has taken such actions. Phone and e-mail messages left by The Associated Press with Bellesiles were not immediately returned.

    Bellesiles resigned in October as a professor at Emory University, after an independent panel of scholars strongly criticized his research. In May, the National Endowment for the Humanities withdrew its name--although not its funding--from a fellowship given to Bellesiles. (pronounced Bell-EEL).

    Bellesiles has acknowledged some errors, but defends his book as fundamentally sound. ``I have never fabricated evidence of any kind nor knowingly evaded my responsibilities as a scholar,'' he said after announcing his resignation.

    The historian spent 10 years working on ``Arming America,'' published by Alfred A. Knopf in 2000. The book challenges the idea that the United States has always been a gun-oriented culture and that well-armed militias were essential to the Revolutionary War.

    Relying on numerous sources, Bellesiles writes that only a small percentage of people possessed firearms in colonial times and that militias were mostly ineffective. Only after the Civil War, he contends, did guns become vital.

    ``Arming America'' was praised in both The New York Times and The New York Review of Books and won the Bancroft Prize, presented to works of ``exceptional merit and distinction in the fields of American history and biography.''

    Many cited it as a devastating statement against America's alleged historical love affair with firearms.

    Gun advocates quickly attacked the book, with National Rifle Association president, actor Charlton Heston, complaining that Bellesiles had ``too much time on his hands.''

    But scholars and critics also became skeptical. In October, Emory released a 40-page study that concluded Bellesiles was ``guilty of unprofessional and misleading work.''

    The report, written by scholars from Harvard and Princeton universities and the University of Chicago, said Bellesiles' failure to cite sources for crucial data ``does move into the realm of 'falsification.''' It also suggested he omitted other researchers' data that contradicted his arguments.

    ``The Bancroft judges operate on a basis of trust,'' said Eric Foner, a past winner and a history professor at Columbia who has served as a prize judge, although not in 2001. ``We assume a book published by a reputable press has gone through a process where people have checked the facts. Members of prize committees cannot be responsible for that.''

    Knopf said in a statement Friday it regretted ``the circumstances that prompted Columbia University to rescind the Bancroft,'' but respected the committee's decision. The paperback edition from Vintage Books, which already includes corrections, will remain in print.

    Columbia said Friday that trustees concurred with the scholars commissioned by Emory and found that Bellesiles had ``violated basic norms of acceptable scholarly conduct.'' NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam praised Columbia's decision as ``appropriate.''

    Previous winners of the Bancroft Prize include such influential works as C. Vann Woodward's ``Origins of the New South,'' Foner's ``Reconstruction'' and Bernard Bailyn's ``The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution.''

    AP-NY-12-13-02 1701EST

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Back to Table of Contents

     
    Gun show opponents plan protest

    By Richard Halstead

    What goes with leaves turning color, a nip in the air and the Thanksgiving holiday?

    For the 18th year running, it's the gun and knife show, which will be held Saturday and Sunday at the Marin Center. And for the third consecutive year, gun show opponents will be outside protesting the event.

    "We feel that this is an inappropriate use of a tax-supported county facility and are concerned that gun shows are not the safest venue for the sale of firearms," said Andrea Windom, president of the Marin chapter of the Million Mom March/United with the Brady Campaign.

    "There is tremendous evidence that more guns in a community mean more gun violence and death in a community," Windom said, "so we don't welcome this."

    Russell Nordyke, whose firm T&R Trade Shows organizes this and a couple dozen other shows throughout the state, is unfazed by the demonstrators.

    "They're just a bunch of old women," Nordyke said. "It don't bother me. It probably helps me. I think people come in just to see them there."

    In 1999, after the shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., Supervisor Hal Brown championed an ordinance to prohibit the sale of guns or ammunition on county property.

    But plans for the ordinance were put on hold after Nordyke and other gun show advocates mounted legal challenges to similar ordinances adopted by Los Angeles, Alameda and Sonoma counties.

    Jack Govi, Marin's deputy county counsel, has advised the supervisors to be cautious.

    "I feel the National Rifle Association could target Marin as a project to try a lawsuit," Govi said. "They could get instant publicity that would be worth 10 times its cost."

    The legal question remains unresolved even though the state Supreme Court ruled in April that counties and cities in California may prohibit gun shows on their fairgrounds and other government properties.

    Still at issue in the pending litigation is whether barring gun shows violates First Amendment protections of speech. The case of Nordyke vs. County of Alameda is pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    "No date has been set for a hearing or oral arguments," said Juliet Leftwich, an attorney with Legal Community Against Violence, an organization that formed after the 101 California St. shooting in San Francisco.

    An ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors in 2000 requires that the gun show producers pay for providing peace officers to assist with security at the shows. Four sheriff's deputies will be on duty at this weekend's event, said Jim Farley, who manages the Marin Center for the county.

    Windom said about 20 people generally turn out for the demonstration, and interest is up somewhat this year due to the publicity surrounding the Washington D.C.-area snipers.

    While handgun sales in the state have been declining for the past 10 years, sales of handguns in Marin increased from 844 in 1992 to 1,267 in 2001, said Mike Van Winkle, a spokesman for the California Department of Justice. But that number was down from the 1,603 sold during 2000.

    Contact Richard Halstead via e-mail at rhalstead@marinij.com

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article
    Marin News

    Back to Table of Contents

     

    Thomas Sowell
    Nov. 26, 2002 / 21

    Gun control myths

    http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Professor Joyce Lee Malcolm of Bentley College deserves some sort of special prize for taking on the thankless task of talking sense on a subject where nonsense is deeply entrenched and fiercely dogmatic. In her recently published book, "Guns and Violence," Professor Malcolm examines the history of firearms, gun control laws and violent crime in England. What makes this more than an exercise in history is its relevance to current controversies over gun control in America.

    Gun control zealots love to make highly selective international comparisons of gun ownership and murder rates. But Joyce Lee Malcolm points out some of the pitfalls in that approach. For example, the murder rate in New York City has been more than five times that of London for two centuries -- and during most of that time neither city had any gun control laws.

    In 1911, New York state instituted one of the most severe gun control laws in the United States, while serious gun control laws did not begin in England until nearly a decade later. But New York City still continued to have far higher murder rates than London.

    If we are serious about the role of guns and gun control as factors in differing rates of violence between countries, then we need to do what history professor Joyce Lee Malcolm does -- examine the history of guns and violence. In England, as she points out, over the centuries "violent crime continued to decline markedly at the very time that guns were becoming increasingly available."

    England's Bill of Rights in 1688 was quite unambiguous that the right of a private individual to be armed was an individual right, independently of any collective right of militias. Guns were as freely available to Englishmen as to Americans, on into the early 20th century.

    Nor was gun control in England a response to any firearms murder crisis. Over a period of three years near the end of the 19th century, "there were only 59 fatalities from handguns in a population of nearly 30 million people," according to Professor Malcolm. "Of these, 19 were accidents, 35 were suicides and only three were homicides -- an average of one a year."

    The rise of the interventionist state in early 20th century England included efforts to restrict ownership of guns. After the First World War, gun control laws began restricting the possession of firearms. Then, after the Second World War, these restrictions grew more severe, eventually disarming the civilian population of England -- or at least the law-abiding part of it.

    It was during this period of severe restrictions on owning firearms that crime rates in general, and the murder rate in particular, began to rise in England. "As the number of legal firearms have dwindled, the numbers of armed crimes have risen," Professor Malcolm points out.

    In 1954, there were only a dozen armed robberies in London but, by the 1990s, there were more than a hundred times as many. In England, as in the United States, drastic crackdowns on gun ownership by law-abiding citizens were accompanied by ever greater leniency to criminals. In both countries, this turned out to be a formula for disaster.

    While England has not yet reached the American level of murders, it has already surpassed the United States in rates of robbery and burglary. Moreover, in recent years the murder rate in England has been going up under still more severe gun control laws, while the murder rate in the United States has been going down as more and more states have allowed private citizens to carry concealed weapons -- and have begun locking up more criminals.

    In both countries, facts have no effect whatever on the dogmas of gun control zealots. The fact that most guns used to murder people in England were not legally purchased has no effect on their faith in gun control laws there, any more than faith in such laws here is affected by the fact that the gun used by the recent Beltway snipers was not purchased legally either.

    In England as in America, sensational gun crimes have been seized upon and used politically to promote crackdowns on gun ownership by law-abiding citizens, while doing nothing about criminals. American zealots for the Brady bill say nothing about the fact that the man who shot James Brady and tried to assassinate President Reagan has been out walking the streets on furlough.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article
    Jewish World Review

    Back to Table of Contents


    City Council votes to register guns
    Wilmington mayor threatens veto, saying bill might violate state law

    By ADAM TAYLOR
    Staff reporter
    11/22/2002


    Wilmington City Council approved a gun registration bill Thursday that calls for all firearms to be registered with the police department. The law takes effect July 1.

    Mayor James M. Baker has said he might veto the bill because he thinks it may violate state law and he would prefer a voluntary registration system.

    The original proposal called for only newly purchased firearms to be registered, but the final version includes existing guns as well.

    Councilman Norman M. Oliver, who sponsored the bill, said registration might not work but is an attempt to halt violence in the city.

    "There's a perception out there that there's frantic gunfire and we have to be proactive," he said.

    There have been 79 shootings in Wilmington this year, up 52 percent from this time last year. Damien R. Williams, the 23-year-old son of Gander Hill prison warden Raphael Williams, is the latest fatality. He was slain Wednesday night after a carjacking.

    Baker voiced his criticisms of the bill after the meeting.

    "I don't really understand what it was intended to do," he said. "It doesn't address anything that would make the streets safer from criminals."

    Owners of shotguns, handguns and rifles would have to register existing weapons as well as new ones when they are acquired. Police would issue a certificate that would have to accompany a weapon at all times.

    The mechanics of the registration process have yet to be worked out.

    Violators would face a fine of as much as $1,000 and a year in prison or both. Law enforcement officers and people transporting weapons through the city would be exempt.

    The bill passed by a 9-3 vote. Voting for it were Oliver, Ted Blunt, Stephanie T. Bolden, Gerard W. Kelly, Kevin F. Kelley Sr., Mike Hare, Charles M. Freel, Norman D. Griffiths and Demetrio Ortega Jr. Voting against it were Paul T. Bartkowski, Gerald L. Brady and Charles Potter Jr. Theo K. Gregory was absent.

    Nine votes are needed to override a mayoral veto. If that were to occur, the bill would become law without Baker's signature.

    Baker said the bill appears to violate a state law that forbids municipalities from imposing restrictions on a citizen's right to own a firearm. City Solicitor John Sheridan said he disagrees, saying registration does not curb anyone's ability to own a gun.

    William S. Montgomery, Baker's chief of staff, said the state Legislature could close any loophole the council might have found in the state law. "This may be a very empty victory and for naught," he said.

    Tony Allen, executive director of the Metropolitan Wilmington Urban League, said his group is prepared to fight any potential state legislative effort to outlaw the city's bill if it becomes law. The recent Urban League study of the 182 shootings in Wilmington from January 1999 to April 2002 motivated Oliver to introduce the bill. The study noted that there are no registration requirements in Delaware to own a gun.

    Oliver said he hopes the bill would help identify stolen guns and discourage criminals from carrying them.

    Bartkowski said criminals would not register their guns. "And we'll be making criminals out of otherwise law-abiding citizens who might not feel comfortable with registration."

    Pat Todd of the League of Women Voters of Delaware said her group favors the bill.

    "Law-abiding people have no fear of registering their firearms, but the Wilmington police have the right to confiscate guns not registered and in the wrong hands," she said.

    City resident Victor Battaglia Jr., an attorney, said he would sue the city on constitutional grounds if the bill becomes law.

    The National Rifle Association opposes registration requirements and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence supports them. Officials from each group said they did not know how prevalent gun registration laws are in the country. NRA spokeswoman Kelly Whitley said New York City and Chicago have such laws. Brady Center spokeswoman Ann Stilwell said seven states have registration requirements of varying degrees.

    Councilman Kelley said he does not understand the opposition to gun registration.

    "We register cars. We register houses. We register pit bulls," he said. "This is no different."

    Resident Paul Falkowski opposed the bill, but unlike other critics, he said he did not think it was well-meaning legislation.

    "This isn't ineffective feel-good stuff," he said. "It's politics. They know a court challenge or a state law will repeal it, but they'll be able to say they tried to accomplish something."
     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article
    The News Journal

    Back to Table of Contents

     

    Brave Investigative Reporter Battles Evil Snipers
    Dr. Michael S. Brown
    Thursday, Nov. 21, 2002


    The case of the "Beltway Snipers" has given liberal, big-city journalists an excuse for renewed attacks on their old enemies, America's gun owners. As in the past, the hallmark of these attacks is an emotional appeal designed to generate fear and loathing in the audience while obscuring any inconvenient facts. Local television news departments trying to hype their ratings during sweeps week have created some of the worst examples.

    A classic attack piece aired on Seattle's KIRO 7 television station on Nov. 18. "Eyewitness News Investigative Reporter" Chris Halsne went on the road to Centralia, Wash., to visit a small town gun show and heroically expose the deadly danger caused by a "gaping loophole" in the Brady Law. His story of how he purchased an AR-15 rifle is so full of falsehoods and distortions that it serves as a comical example of advocacy journalism gone terribly wrong.

    Halsne first identifies the AR-15 as a "sniper's rifle." In reality it is an emasculated civilian version of the standard infantryman's rifle, which is never used by real snipers and rarely used by criminals. Any common deer rifle is much more powerful and much closer in function to actual sniper rifles. He goes on to inflame KIRO viewers with laughably dramatic phrases like "blood-filled morgues" and "human target practice." This is political theater masquerading as news.

    At the gun show, he makes the outrageous and slanderous claim that felons and mental patients are welcome, while neglecting to mention that both groups are prohibited by law from owning firearms. He implies that purchasing a rifle in a gun shop requires a waiting period. In Washington it does not.

    He mentions that the D.C. "sniper" rifle seems to have evaded the normal paperwork, but he fails to tell KIRO viewers that the infamous rifle was most likely stolen from a gun store. To do so would have ended his attempt to defame gun shows by linking them to the D.C. killings. He also never explains how more paperwork would help, when criminals prefer to use stolen or untraceable guns.

    Halsne could have done a useful investigative report by thoughtfully exploring the interesting story of the federal law that requires only licensed dealers to perform background checks and file the forms associated with retail gun sales. If he had asked the private sellers at the gun show, most would have told him that they would love to have a license and follow the rules. Many were probably licensed at one time.

    Unfortunately, small-gun dealers were forced out of the system during the anti-gun hysteria of the early 1990s and became private sellers by default.

    A real journalist would have mentioned the government study that found only 0.7 percent of crime guns were obtained at gun shows, but that would have spoiled a frightening tale.

    An honest journalist would have pointed out that all laws apply at gun shows just as they do everywhere else, but that would have exposed the effort to falsely portray gun shows as free-trade zones where laws are magically suspended.

    Slavishly following the standard attack plan, Halsne obtained the obligatory hand-wringing comments from Washington State's anti-gun lobby, but he got more than he bargained for when he interviewed Sheriff John McCroskey of Lewis County, site of the evil gun show.

    McCroskey is not like the politically correct urban police chiefs so familiar to KIRO reporters. He refused to play along with the act and later wrote up his side of the story in the local newspaper, making fun of Halsne's attempt to create alarm about a perfectly legal activity. The only thing frightening to Sheriff McCroskey is that there is now a liberal reporter out there with a gun.

    The precisely aimed smear job by CBS-affiliate KIRO and dramatic storyteller Chris Halsne suggests that a sinister sniper subculture has arisen within the unregulated community of honest reporters. Contact your legislators at once to close this gaping loophole by passing strict new laws requiring more government paperwork to ensure the ethical conduct of journalists.

    Dr. Michael S. Brown is an optometrist and member of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws, www.dsgl.org. He may be reached at rkba2000@yahoo.com
     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Original Article
    NewMax.com

    Back to Table of Contents

     

    Judge Sentences Rancher for Harassing
    Mexican Migrant


    The News Staff - 11/18/2002

    United States District Court Judge James M. Simmonds on Sunday found Coy T. Brown guilty of assaulting Mexican immigrant Juan Mauricio Gonzalez with a fire arm and sentenced him to five years in prison, Notimex reported.

    After a two-year investigation spearheaded by the Foreign Relations Secretariat, Brown was found guilty of firing a pistol on April 10, 2000, at Gonzalez, a native of Tasquillo, Hidalgo.

    In addition to his prison sentence, Brown, a Texas rancher, was denied bail and assessed a 10,000-dollar fine, the SRE said.

    The SRE applauded the judge's decision and said it would intensify its efforts to fight for Mexican immigrant rights abroad.

    ~ Jim Robinson  ~

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Original Article
    TheNewsMexico.com

    Back to Table of Contents


    Get a Gun
    Geoff Metcalf
    Monday, Nov. 18, 2002


    The best way I know to win an argument is to start by being in the right. – Lord Hailshan
    We are at war and every one of us has a responsibility and a right to defend each other and ourselves. This is not hyperbole. It is not fear mongering. It is FACT.
    Item #1 in a list of "Rules for a gunfight" is "Bring a gun. Preferably, bring at least two guns. Bring all of your friends who have guns."

    About three years ago a friend told me a story about a colleague of his, Jerry Molen, who was one of the executive producers of "Schindler's List."

    In the wake of the film's critical acclaim, Molen was speaking to some group. He noticed in the audience an old man who was staring intently at him during his speech. He said he felt odd by the intensity of the glare.

    After the speech he was basking in the glow of audience approval when the old man walked up to him. The old man pointed a craggy finger at Molen and with a voice filled with intensity and seriousness, he said "Don't you EVER let them take YOUR guns." Molen noticed that the right forearm of the old man had a series of faded blue numbers tattooed on his flesh.

    In the '90s there was a media/federal jihad against militias. In the New Millennium militias may again save the republic.

    Notwithstanding the marginalized stereotype of militias as being gap-toothed, camouflaged, knuckle-dragging wannabe Rambos … militias have been, are and will/should be an integral part of protecting the country.

    It was President John F. Kennedy who said, "Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

    Once upon a time long ago (1676) and far away, my ancestor Michael Metcalf returned to his home in Dedham, Mass., to discover it burned by Native Americans. He joined a militia and with other militias fought in "King Philips War" http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Prairie/9324/KPW/hiskpw.htm.

    Today's modern militias remain an eclectic collection of constitutionally conservative folks from all walks of life. Sure, some of them are extremists, racists and criminals … but the same can be said for Democrats, Republicans, Christians, Jews and Muslims. To damn any group for the sins of the few is beyond myopic and disingenuous.

    Since 9/11 and the inevitability of planned, organized terrorist attacks, the militia concept should be embraced and not vilified.

    And it IS! The Arizona Daily Star wrote, "Cochise County's 'official newspaper' has issued a call to arms and is spearheading the formation of a local militia to combat illegal immigration." And the liberals went NUTS!

    Sheriff Larry Dever said frustrations with the federal government's inability to stem the flow of illegal immigration have attracted the attention of a number of groups on all sides of the issue. Hey, how about the federal government's inability to post a platoon of combat troops in every neighborhood?

    Militias SHOULD be local people. Militias should be neighborhood watch programs with guns as well as telephones.

    Your right to own a gun is inalienable. You have a God-given right to protect and defend yourself, your family and your property. Any and all other legislative masturbation to the contrary, designed to erode, undermine or attrite that right is invalid, immoral and an invitation to massive non-compliance.

    The Second Amendment was not intended to guarantee my bird hunting, or for states to maintain militias. It was, and is, as even Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe (liberal icon) acknowledges, an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT.

    After the alleged end of the Cold War, several CIA types were informally meeting with a group of their KGB counterparts. Eventually, after a few vodkas, the question was asked, "So Ivan, did you guys actually have plans for invading CONUS [Continental United States]?"

    Reportedly the KGB officer laughed, "Hell no!"

    "Why not?" asked a CIA suit.

    "Your people have too many guns."

    Those "Minutemen" Kennedy longed for, that the Russians recognize and Clintonite liberals would abolish, are the bone and sinew of a country's strength and they do exist.

    Despite unbridled persistent efforts of the Clintons, Gore, Janet Reno, Sarah Brady, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer et al., at least so far there remain tens of millions of Americans who would rather die on their feet than live on their knees (or wait bleeding for 911 to send help).

    I suggest it will not be the camo-clad weekend paint-ballers and wannabe stereotyped militia Rambos who will refuse to comply with confiscation. Resistance will come from the remaining former military that still believe in the sacred oath of their youth. It will be the blue-haired grandmothers who protect their family and their heritage that would rather die martyrs than live as slaves.

    Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.
     

    Back to Table of Contents

     

    Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow

    Posted: 5:02 p.m. EST November 14, 2002
    Updated: 6:23 p.m. EST November 14, 2002



    PALM BEACH COUNTY, Fla. -- A jury has awarded the widow of teacher Barry Grunow $1.2 million from a gun distributor.

    Pam Grunow's lawsuit accused Valor Corp of distributing a gun that was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it."

    The case stems from the murder of teacher Barry Grunow by one of his students. Nathaniel Brazill shot Grunow to death two years ago in a West Palm Beach classroom.

    Pam Grunow's lawyer asked for $76 million. But the jury found gun distributor Valor Corporation 5 percent liable for Grunow's death. The owner of the gun and the school board held the most of the liability, the jury found.

    The jury didn't find any liability for Nathanial Brazill, who pulled the trigger. Brazill stole the unloaded gun and bullets from a cookie tin stashed away in a dresser drawer of family friend Elmore McCray.


    The jury said Grunow's family should get $24 million from the three parties. The school board was told to pay her $10.8 million, and the family friend was told to pay $12 million.


    This is the first lawsuit in the country in which a gun company has in any way been held responsible in a murder.
     

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read the Original Article

    http://www.click10.com/mia/news/stories/news-178688020021114-161135.html

    Back to Table of Contents




    Chuck Muth's News & Views 
    November 3, 2002

    Dishonoring
    an Honor Guard


    Chuck,

    I have been a subscriber to your newsletter for a few months now, and I thought you would be interested in this story...

    I have been a police officer in the SF Bay Area for nine years, and I am a member of my department's Ceremonial Honor Guard. We perform parades, flag presentations, burial services and memorial services for fallen police officers, and other ceremonial functions. We perform our services for NO PAY (or any other compensation). We do it on our own time, and only for the honor of representing our country, our flag, our department, and those who have served before us.

    On Friday (11/1/02), we sent a four-man flag detail (including me) to the Oakland Arena to present the colors at the Golden State Warriors basketball game. This was done as the result of a request by the Golden State Warriors.
    As you might expect, we brought the California flag, the United States flag, and two unloaded rifles for the ceremony.

    When we got to the arena, we were asked by Warriors representatives to leave the rifles in our car. We were told that the Warriors front office did not want to "scare" anyone by having the rifles in the arena. Let me be perfectly clear about this...all four members of the Honor Guard are CURRENT
    police officers who were in FULL DRESS UNIFORM, including LOADED handguns.  As a sidenote, we are ALL former military (2 Army, 2 Marine Corps) with over 50 years of military experience between us.

    Our commander told the Warriors front office that we were prepared to do the presentation of the colors WITH the rifle element, but as a matter of
    principle, we would not go on without them. The Warriors front office left us in limbo for about an hour, before telling us they would not be needing
    our services that evening. We rolled up our flags, and left without delay.

    I am still a bit in shock. Have we gotten to the point in this country that the sight of four uniformed police officers holding unloaded rifles in a
    ceremonial flag presentation causes panic among the public? To those in the Warriors front office, it seems we have. What a shame.

    - Jeff Snell

     

     


     


     - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Um, you know how I hate to stir up trouble (yeah, right), but if you're as ticked off at this most recent example of hysterical anti-gun, politically-correct stupidity as I am, then you might just want to join me in contacting the Public Relations department of the so-called "Warriors" front office at:

     

    pr@gs-warriors.com

    ...or call or write to:

    Golden State Warriors
    Department of Weenies
    1011 Broadway
    Oakland, CA 94607
    (510) 986-2200


    Here's what I'm sending.  Borrow as you see fit.  You can even cut and paste and simply write "Ditto" in the Subject line if you like:

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  -

    To whom it may concern,

    It has come to my attention that Warriors' management refused to allow an Honor Guard of police professionals - all military veterans - to present
    the colors at Friday's game because the contingent included - along with the American and California state flags -two unloaded rifles which might "scare"
    people.

    Are you folks nuts?  What were you thinking?

    You should immediately invite the Honor Guard back for the next Warriors home game and open up the activities with a personal apology delivered at center court by the hysterical "genius" who was responsible for this ridiculous decision.

    What an insult to our public safety professionals and military veterans. You should be ashamed.

    Chuck Muth
    1315 Wilson Point Road
    Middle River, MD  21220
    chuckmuth@earthlink.net

    cc:  Jon Becker, Sports Editor, Oakland Tribune
    jbecker@angnewspapers.com

     

    Back to Table of Contents


    SUREFIRE CRIME CONTROL...WE NEED MORE OF IT!!

    What a Woman!

    MELBOURNE, Australia --
    Gun-toting granny Ava Estelle, 81, was so ticked-off when two thugs raped her 18-year-old granddaughter that she tracked the unsuspecting ex-cons down and shot off their testicles.

    The old lady spent a week hunting those men down -- and when she found them, she took revenge on them in her own special way,- said Melbourne
    police investigator Evan Delp. Then she took a taxi to the nearest police station, laid the gun on the sergeant's desk and told him as calm as could be:
    "Those bastards will never rape anybody again, by God." Cops say convicted rapist and robber Davis Furth, 33, lost both his penis and his testicles when
    outraged Ava opened fire with a 9-mm pistol in the hotel room where he and former prison cellmate Stanley Thomas, 29, were holed up. The wrinkled
    avenger also blew Thomas' testicles to kingdom come, but doctors managed to save his mangled penis, police said. The one guy, Thomas, didn't lose
    his manhood, but the doctor I talked to said he won't be using it the way he used to, Detective Delp told reporters. Both men are still in pretty bad shape, but I think they're just happy to be alive after what they've been through.


    The Rambo Granny swung into action June 21 after her granddaughter Debbie was carjacked and raped in broad daylight by two knife-wielding creeps in
    a section of town bordering on skid row. "When I saw the look on my Debbie's face that night in the hospital, I decided I was going to go out and get those bastards myself 'cause I figured the Law would go easy on them," recalled the retired library worker. "And I wasn't scared of them, either -- because I've got me a gun and I've been shootin' all my life. And I wasn't dumb enough to turn it in when the law changed about owning one."


    So, using a police artist's sketch of the suspects and Debbie's description of the sickos', tough-as-nails Ava spent seven days prowling the wino-infested neighborhood where the crime took place till she spotted the ill-fated rapists entering their flophouse hotel. "I knew it was them the minute I saw 'em, but I shot a picture of 'em anyway and took it back to Debbie and she said sure as hell, it was them," the oldster recalled. "So I went back to that hotel and found their room and knocked on the door -- and the minute the big one, Furth, opened the door, I shot 'em right square between the legs, right where it would really hurt 'em most, you know.  Then I went in and shot the other one as he backed up pleading to me to
    spare him. Then I went down to the police station and turned myself in."

    Now, baffled lawmen are trying to figure out exactly how to deal with the vigilante granny. What she did was wrong, and she broke the law, but it is difficult to throw an 81-year-old woman in prison. Det. Delp said. Especially when 3 million people in the city want to nominate her for sainthood and a medal.

     

    Detective Jeffrey Allen Green
    Child Abuse Team
    Clackamas County Sheriff's Office
    2223 Kaen Rd
    Oregon City, Oregon 97045
    Phone: (503) 655-8218
    Fax: (503) 655-8549

    Back to Table of Contents

     





    Home Page  ~  Link Page  ~  News Page ~ Buying a Pistol ~ Sales ~ Support Groups



    *Click* Here

    Return to Main Page




    Back to Top of Page


     




     


    Karl's Main Page | Karl's Book Store | Decks-Decks-Decks | Plans and Projects
     Tool-Stop | Build-a-Boat at Home | Karl's Links | The Business Builder






    Webmaster & design by Karl Schaupp 
    Copyright 2002 by The Construction Resource Center
    All rights reserved